i
Frost & Sullivan
Filter interviews by
I was interviewed in Dec 2020.
Frost & Sullivan interview questions for designations
Design a pms model for startup
I applied via campus placement at Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Lucknow
Suppose you have a PE firm as your client, looking to invest in a company into packaging business. The client has 2 options.
• Company A: 200Cr in revenues, 15 Cr EBITDA, Growth rate 10%
• Company B: 150 Cr in revenues, 18 Cr EBITDA, Growth rate 15%
You have to assess the options. However, you cannot ask for more than two data points from me/client.
[Please note that I stands for Interviewer and C stands for Candidate]
C: I would ask for the following two data points:
1. Purpose of the investment? I want to understand if the investment has a larger strategic motive or if it is being done purely from an investment perspective.
2. Considering we are looking at EBITDA numbers right now and not the net profit, I would want to know the capital structure of the two companies - debt/equity split and financial costs, if any.
I: The client is PE firm. They are only motive is to maximize their profits. (I do not remember him mentioning that the client was a PE firm initially. If he did, this was a blunder on my part.) Gave me numbers for capital structure, interest costs.
C: Based on the limited information available, Company B appears to be the better option. Do you want me to explore the two options further?
I: Yes, maybe we can dig deeper. What are some other factors that would affect the decision?
C: Listed factors like - revenue current and future, interest burden, volatility of revenue (risks), diversity of revenue streams (to hedge against risks), environmental factors, increasing costs, etc.
I: Asked me to think more. What would be that one piece of information that would change your decision altogether?
C: ROI to the firm (How much would I need to invest to earn x% return) - this should have been mentioned before (ideally) - defended myself by saying that I had asked for the capital structure and as per his reply capital investment was comparable.
I: Gave me feedback. You could have thought about the total capital requirement of the firm. Did not consider whether the companies would need to raise additional capital to grow at the projected rates - apart from the money they would be raising from our client.
Your client is an EPC company (construction business). They work in construction of roads, buildings, water tanks, etc. The client has heard from a friend that there are growing opportunities in water sector. The client has reached out for your help to figure out whether they should pursue this.
[Please note that I stands for Interviewer and C stands for Candidate]
C: Started with CPCC to understand the context. Asked questions on the motives.
I: Gave me facts about the company, competition, market scenario for EPC players.
C: You initially mentioned that the client has a presence in water tanks - you mentioned projects like construction of water tanks. What are these new opportunities that we are exploring now? Are they different from the kind of work we already do?
I: Gave me a detailed description of water sector projects - different categories.
C: Asked a few questions related to each category - customer profiles, market size, growth rates, competition.
C: I believe I have got a good sense of the overall business and the opportunity we are analyzing right now. I would now proceed to analyze the factors that could have an impact on the decision.
Started with PESTLE, Porter's 5 forces. However, he asked me to quickly list all the factors - did not give a lot of information.
I: From our discussion so far, can you list the top 3-4 factors that will be relevant to the decision?
C: Listed 3 factors.
I: Alright. So, let us assume after all the discussion, we have narrowed down on XX opportunity and it requires an investment of INR 1000 Cr. The project would give the client INR 100 Cr in cash inflows for the next 15 years. Should the client go ahead with this?
C: Asked questions about equity/debt split, cost of capital, cost of debt. He gave me the numbers.
I started with the calculation at this point. I was 30-40 seconds into the calculation when he realized that the calculation had become a little complicated (because of the additional information he had just given me).
I: Let us not get into the entire calculation. That may take too much time. Tell me the approach you were following.
C: Explained IRR calculation. IF IRR> Weighted cost of capital - profitable investment. If not, the client should not invest.
I applied via campus placement at Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Lucknow
Client is a ropes and nets manufacturer. Their growth has slowed down while their margins are improving. They want to achieve full potential. Help them.
[Please note that I stands for Interviewer and C stands for Candidate]
C: What is the current growth level?
I: Single digit.
C: What is the KRA for achieving full potential?
I: Sales acceleration- double business in 5 years.
C: Who are primary clients and what is our product mix?
I: Primary industries are fishing, construction and agriculture. Let us restrict our analysis to nets.
C: Is it correct to assume our products include safety nets, fishing nets and shade nets predominantly across the three industries?
I: Yes
C: Is it safe to assume that we operate across the value chain and the distribution network is dealership module with region wise traders in place?
I: Yes, distribution module is the most critical and works in the dealership mechanism.
C: How much market share is captured by us and how is the competitive landscape?
I: We are a dominant player.
C: Shall I analyze all the 3 industries and layout their sales acceleration strategy or focus on any particular industry?
I: Let us start with fishing industry.
C: How many types of fishing net do we have? What is the quality, material, and life of these nets?
I: Nylon and rayon nets. Average life 7 years
C: I would like to analyze the product mix, pricing, and distribution aspects across the existing and new potential markets.
I: That is good. Asked follow up questions on what in each bucket would you analyze. Asked to guesstimate the size of the fisherman market.
C: Discussed broad approach. Extrapolated Bengal population to average out the population of coastal states. Divided population by income levels and assumed proportion of population in the segment involved in fishing industry. Estimated overall market demand considering initial and replacement demand based on average years mentioned. Considered market growth @ 5% lower than GDP owing to nature of product. Selling Price of net given by interviewer.
I: Summarize the case and give key next steps to achieve full potential.
C: Checked for any time or spending limit. Suggested recommendations across product, contract-strategy, and distribution network. Product diversification into relatively lower grade and life of net. Increase variants other than rayon and nylon and other use cases for the product. Recommended long-term contracts with fisherman and rental option. Streamline Distribution network across operations. With dealership restricted to one player across prominent regions. Reduce overheads and increases sales.
Your client is an OTA aggregator. It is growing really well at 20-30% over the last 5-6 years. It wants to be IPO ready in 5 years but has negative EBITDA. Chart out the strategy.
[Please note that I stands for Interviewer and C stands for Candidate]
C: Since when is the client operating?
I: 10 years.
C: What is its current market share and how many competitors exist?
I: 30% share and it is the 3rd largest player among the few competitors.
C: What are key services. Are we like MMT with flights and hotels as are key product offerings? Do we offer any other product?
I: Yes, while flights and hotels capture 80% and 15% of revenue mix. We also offer train/bus booking and experiences with experiences captures less than 1%.
C: Are we facing negative EBITDA across all segments?
I: Yes.
C: Primary revenue sources would be commissions. Is my understanding correct?
I: Yes.
C: Is it safe to assume we are primarily catering to the upper middle class and the rich?
I: Yes.
C: Since a path to EBITDA positive is key consideration. I would like to divide my analysis into understanding revenue growth opportunities and secondly look at areas of cost minimization. Is that ok and would you like me to focus on any of the above analysis?
I: Yes, let us focus on revenue.
C: As our revenue model is commission based, I would like to confirm if it is safe to assume that the commission is based on both value and volume of transactions?
I: No, it is based only on value.
C: Since this is a B2B2C operations, I would like to analyze revenue growth opportunities through 2 key stakeholders the customers and the retailers.
I: Let us start with retailers.
C: Shall I focus on flight and hotel segment as they comprise 95% of our revenue?
I: Yes, can you give me suggestions on revenue improvement for these two segments.
C: Laid out my analysis across 3 segments: existing revenue model and scope, and contract strategy, promotions. Suggested enhancing existing revenue model by transition to commission model based on value and volume to benefit from both open and click rates. Suggested push marketing for low ticket purchases increase experience segment contribution. Revamp contract strategy to ensure increase product placement and bundled offers for improving commission paid by retailers.
Focus on revenue from advertisements on desktop, mobile website, and mobile application. Enter new segment and deprioritize segments with low revenue potential. Discussed on bus and train segment. Increase experience offerings to include products offered by likes of Thrillophilia.
I: We are planning on entering car rental. Should we do that?
C: Broke down the cab rental space talked about existing players like Zoomcar predominantly which has captured the market. Discussed about time and resource constraint given negative EBITDA of existing operations.
I: Agreed and asked if we should acquire something like Zoomcar?
C: Suggested no and substantiated based on disadvantages despite the benefits of the strategy keeping in mind the objective of IPO in 5 years.
I: Agreed with recommendation. Please summarize the case.
Some of the top questions asked at the Frost & Sullivan Consultant interview -
based on 4 reviews
Rating in categories
Senior Research Analyst
72
salaries
| ₹5 L/yr - ₹16 L/yr |
Industry Analyst
65
salaries
| ₹7 L/yr - ₹18.5 L/yr |
Research Analyst
50
salaries
| ₹4 L/yr - ₹11.5 L/yr |
Consultant
45
salaries
| ₹9 L/yr - ₹21 L/yr |
Senior Consultant
30
salaries
| ₹13.1 L/yr - ₹27 L/yr |
McKinsey & Company
BCG
Deloitte
PwC