This rating is based on a small number of reviews, so it may not fully
reflect the overall employee experience.
Updated 20 Apr, 2021
Overall Rating
2.0/5
How AmbitionBox ratings work?
Category Ratings
3.0
Job Security
2.0
Company culture
2.0
Work-Life balance
2.0
Skill development
2.0
Work Satisfaction
1.0
Salary & Benefits
1.0
Promotions/Appraisal
Screen Rant is rated
2.0 out of 5 stars on
AmbitionBox, based on 1 company reviews.This rating
reflects a below average employee experience, indicating poor satisfaction with
the company’s work culture, benefits, and career growth opportunities. AmbitionBox gathers authentic employee reviews and ratings, making it a trusted platform for job seekers and employees in India.
Read more
Screen Rant is rated
2.0 out of 5 stars on
AmbitionBox, based on 1 company reviews.This rating
reflects a below average employee experience, indicating poor satisfaction with
the company’s work culture, benefits, and career growth opportunities. AmbitionBox gathers authentic employee reviews and ratings, making it a trusted platform for job seekers and employees in India.
We strive to keep our reviews 100% genuine. Employers cannot manipulate reviews.
1 review found
Sort by:
Popular
Content Writer in
Willoughby
Advertising & Creative Department
2.0
Overall Rating
2.0
Category Ratings
1.0
Promotions/Appraisal
2.0
Skill Development
2.0
Company Culture
2.0
Work Satisfaction
1.0
Salary & Benefits
3.0
Job Security
2.0
Work-Life Balance
posted on 20 Apr 2021
Likes
I applied to many job openings Valnet had at the time and they chose me to write for Screen Rant's tech section, which was exciting.
I felt very fortunate to get hired by a company with a website that had 50 million views per month. The exposure was something I looked forward to, since I didn't have any other writing jobs where I was credited author of my work.
I got mostly positive feedback for my work, and I felt that I got promoted within the team rather quickly. They also liked my design abilities and they effort that I put into many of my images....Read More
Dislikes
They claim to have high quality and standards. They do not. Even editor can fail to find writing mistakes.
Me and the head editor would often clash over the direction of some of the articles. Usually, these issues involved me following directions and then one of the editors telling me to include something that was never mentioned inthe brief or the reference links. Revising articles was a pain because the structure and work limit meant that I couldn't just freely add or change sentences. It was like trying to solve a hard puzzle.
<mark style="background-color: #fff5e4;">
The pay was paltry; just $10 per article</mark>. I figured that I could write multiple articles in a day but I ended up writing no more than 1 article daily due to their low volume of assignments. With how they want their articles structured and along with other tasks such as designing header images and creating links, it took longer for a 500-600 word article than they originally promised. They did give me a raise to $15, but it still felt like just $15 a day for what seemed like a full-time job. They really expect writers to do more with less, as there is no extra pay for revisions or design work.
They are constantly hiring new writers, and even though I expressed interest to them assuming multiple positions within the company, they would refuse.
Editors would always encourage me to come up with ideas for articles. I had many ideas, but they were more often rejected than accepted. We weren't allowed to write about topics like how to pair a game controller with a phone or antivirus software for Macs, but we were allowed to write about Tesla, Netflix and fitness apps. Again, this was for their "tech" section.
My time with them came to an end after they returned 3 articles to me at once, each for frivolous reasons, and told me they needed to be rewritten. That was when I decided the job wasn't worth keeping and that I should look elsewhere....Read More
Work Details
I would write for Screen Rant's tech section. I liked being able to write about phones and cameras. Being able to demonstrate my design skills was also a plus.
Screen Rant is rated 2.0 out of 5, based on 1 reviews by employees on AmbitionBox.
Screen Rant is known for Job Security which is rated at the top and given a rating of 3.0. However, Salary & Benefits is rated the lowest at 1.0 and can be improved. To know first hand how it is like to work at Screen Rant read detailed reviews based on various job profiles, departments and locations in the reviews section.
How is the salary at Screen Rant?
According to AmbitionBox ratings, Screen Rant employees rate its salary and benefits as 1.0 out of 5. You can know more about Screen Rant Salaries at AmbitionBox
How is the work culture at Screen Rant?
Work culture is rated 2.0 at Screen Rant by 1 employees. While job security is rated 3.0 and work-life balance is rated 2.0 at Screen Rant. Read detailed reviews by employees of Screen Rant on AmbitionBox.