Filter interviews by
I applied via Walk-in and was interviewed before Dec 2021. There were 2 interview rounds.
Top trending discussions
posted on 31 Jan 2025
I was interviewed in Dec 2024.
Platform: Coderbyte Test. The process is similar to the technical round, except that in the last bash script question, instead of printing the last character, print the third last character of each line.
I applied via Naukri.com and was interviewed in Dec 2024. There were 3 interview rounds.
I applied via Recruitment Consulltant and was interviewed in Nov 2024. There were 3 interview rounds.
I applied via Naukri.com and was interviewed in Dec 2024. There was 1 interview round.
I got several invitation calls from 3 different persons for the same interview at Xebia Bangalore Brigade office.I attended an interview at Xebia on January 11, 2025, and the experience was disappointing. Despite reading several negative reviews beforehand, I chose to give the company a fair chance, but unfortunately, the concerns expressed in those reviews turned out to be valid.
From the very beginning, the process was poorly managed. I waited for over three hours before being called, while candidates who arrived after me were invited for their interviews earlier. This inconsistency immediately raised questions about the fairness of their process.
When my turn finally came, the interview began with a moderately challenging SQL question: I was asked to fetch all invalid December month transaction IDs (which is coming in ooo hours) from a dataset, applying conditions such as working hours from Monday to Friday (9 AM to 4 PM), excluding weekends and specific holidays (24th and 25th December). While I attempted to solve this, the interviewer interrupted repeatedly with casual, unrelated remarks. These interruptions disrupted my concentration and added unnecessary pressure, making it difficult to focus on solving the query effectively.
Following this, the interviewer moved to a Python question, which involved determining whether a given number was a perfect square. Although the problem itself was simple, it included irrelevant details, such as pre-imported libraries in a web-based IDE. This added an unnecessary layer of complexity and confusion. Again, the interviewer’s interruptions and casual talk distracted me further. Instead of focusing on assessing my logic and problem-solving skills, he seemed more interested in making irrelevant comments.
What stood out most negatively was the interviewer’s unprofessional behavior. At one point, he made an inappropriate remark about my name, comparing it to his own, which he claimed was not as "weighted."
I asked his name politely and he replied " Vaibhav Gupta"
While I attempted to steer the conversation back to technical discussions, his attitude remained dismissive and unfocused. He even questioned my leadership skills but turned it into an argument instead of allowing me to explain.
I also noticed disparities in how candidates were treated. For instance, a female candidate before me was given over an hour for her interview, while mine felt rushed and dismissive. While this is my personal observation, it raised concerns about bias in their evaluation process.
The interview ended abruptly and on a negative note. When I tried to discuss architectural patterns for data pipelines, the interviewer dismissed my points outright, stating that they did not need data architects. Without providing proper closure, he left the room, leaving me feeling disrespected and undervalued.
Overall, the experience was frustrating and insulting. The interviewer’s behavior was unprofessional and dismissive, and the process lacked the basic respect and fairness expected in a professional setting. Based on my experience, I strongly believe that Xebia needs to overhaul their interview practices, ensuring a more structured, unbiased, and respectful approach toward candidates.
I am relieved I was not selected, as this experience highlighted what could likely be a toxic work environment. I would not recommend Xebia to anyone, as their lack of professionalism and courtesy reflects poorly on their organizational culture.
Data structure was more and it was difficult round
I applied via Naukri.com and was interviewed in Nov 2024. There was 1 interview round.
I applied via Referral and was interviewed in Sep 2024. There were 3 interview rounds.
I handle escalations by addressing the issue promptly, involving necessary stakeholders, and providing regular updates.
Address the issue promptly to prevent further escalation
Involve necessary stakeholders to gather input and support
Provide regular updates to all parties involved to ensure transparency and progress
Implement solutions to prevent similar escalations in the future
Long-term securities are investments held for an extended period, while short-term securities are held for a shorter duration.
Long-term securities typically have maturity dates of over one year, such as bonds or stocks.
Short-term securities have maturity dates of one year or less, like Treasury bills or certificates of deposit.
Long-term securities offer higher potential returns but also higher risk, while short-term se...
Yield to Maturity is the total return anticipated on a bond if it is held until it matures.
Yield to Maturity is the annual rate of return an investor can expect to earn if the bond is held until it matures.
It takes into account the bond's current market price, par value, coupon interest rate, and time to maturity.
Yield to Maturity helps investors compare different bonds and make informed investment decisions.
For exampl...
DSA based on any general language prefer C++
Interview experience
based on 42 reviews
Rating in categories
SAP Consultant
67
salaries
| ₹4.8 L/yr - ₹18.4 L/yr |
Consultant
32
salaries
| ₹5 L/yr - ₹17 L/yr |
Senior SAP Consultant
29
salaries
| ₹10 L/yr - ₹22 L/yr |
Senior Consultant
21
salaries
| ₹9.6 L/yr - ₹25.1 L/yr |
SAP Basis Consultant
19
salaries
| ₹3.5 L/yr - ₹14 L/yr |
Xoriant
CitiusTech
HERE Technologies
BT Business