Top 40 Manual Testing Interview Questions and Answers 2024

Automation testing is the use of tools and scripts to execute test cases, while manual testing is performed manually by human testers.

• Automation testing involves the use of automation tools and scripts to execute test cases.

• Manual testing is performed manually by human testers without the use of automation tools.

• Automation testing is faster and more efficient for repetitive tasks.

• Manual testing allows for exploratory testing and human intuition.

• Automation testing is suitable ...read more

Manual testing is the process of manually testing software for defects, while functional testing focuses on testing the functionality of the software.

• Manual testing involves executing test cases manually without the use of automation tools.

• It requires human intervention to validate the software against specified requirements.

• Functional testing verifies that the software meets the functional requirements and performs as expected.

• It ensures that each function of the software ap...read more

Automation is the use of technology to perform tasks without human intervention, while manual refers to tasks performed by humans.

• Automation involves the use of machines, software, or other technology to perform tasks.

• Manual refers to tasks that are performed by humans using their physical abilities and skills.

• Automation aims to increase efficiency, accuracy, and productivity by reducing human involvement.

• Manual tasks require human decision-making, physical effort, and attent...read more

Manual testing is a process of testing software manually without using any automated tools.

• Types of manual testing include functional testing, regression testing, integration testing, user acceptance testing, and exploratory testing.

• Functional testing checks if the software meets the specified requirements.

• Regression testing ensures that changes made to the software do not affect its existing functionality.

• Integration testing checks if the software components work together as...read more

Manually testing a network involves using various tools and techniques to identify vulnerabilities and potential security threats.

• Performing port scans to identify open ports and services

• Conducting penetration testing to simulate attacks and identify weaknesses

• Reviewing firewall and router configurations

• Analyzing network traffic for anomalies

• Testing user authentication and access controls

• Checking for outdated software and firmware

• Assessing physical security measures

• Social eng...read more

Selenium is a good tool for automated testing, while manual testing is essential for certain scenarios.

• Selenium is great for automating repetitive test cases and regression testing

• Manual testing is important for exploratory testing and usability testing

• Combining both Selenium and manual testing can provide comprehensive test coverage

A defect in manual testing refers to an issue or flaw in the software application that is identified during the testing process.

• Defects can include functionality issues, design flaws, performance problems, or security vulnerabilities.

• Defects are typically logged in a defect tracking system and assigned to developers for resolution.

• Examples of defects include a button not working as intended, incorrect calculations in a financial application, or a security loophole allowing un...read more

Manual testing is the process of manually testing software for defects, functionality, and usability. STLC stands for Software Testing Life Cycle.

• Manual testing involves executing test cases without the use of automation tools.

• It includes activities like test planning, test case development, test execution, and defect reporting.

• STLC is a series of steps followed to ensure the quality of the software being tested.

• STLC stages include requirements analysis, test planning, test c...read more

My favorite tool in manual testing is the Chrome Developer Tools.

• Allows for inspecting elements on a webpage

• Can test network requests and responses

• Helps in debugging JavaScript code

• Useful for analyzing performance issues

• Can simulate different device types and screen sizes

Manual testing involves executing test cases without the use of automation tools. Test case writing is the process of documenting steps to test a specific functionality.

• Manual testing is the process of executing test cases by hand to identify software defects.

• Test case writing involves documenting detailed steps to test a specific functionality or feature.

• Manual testing requires human intervention to observe and verify the expected behavior of the software.

• Test cases should b...read more

Methods in manual testing include black box testing, white box testing, unit testing, integration testing, system testing, and acceptance testing.

• Black box testing: Testing the functionality of the software without knowing its internal code.

• White box testing: Testing the internal code and structure of the software.

• Unit testing: Testing individual units or components of the software.

• Integration testing: Testing the integration of different units or components.

• System testing: T...read more

Manual testing on different load testing involves testing the system's performance under varying loads manually.

• Manually simulate different levels of user activity to test system response

• Monitor system performance metrics during each load test

• Identify bottlenecks or performance issues under different load conditions

• Adjust load levels to find optimal system performance

• Document findings and recommendations for improvement

Risk based testing is a method of prioritizing testing efforts based on the likelihood and impact of potential failures.

• Identify potential risks and their impact on the system

• Prioritize testing efforts based on the identified risks

• Allocate resources accordingly to mitigate the identified risks

• Continuously monitor and reassess risks throughout the testing process

Manual testing of games involves playing the game to identify and report bugs.

• Manual testing involves playing the game step by step to ensure all features work correctly.

• Testers need to actively look for bugs such as graphical glitches, gameplay issues, or crashes.

• Bugs found during manual testing need to be documented with detailed steps to reproduce.

• Examples of bugs include characters getting stuck in walls, items disappearing, or game crashes.

• Testers need to have good atten...read more

Automated testing involves using software tools to execute tests, while manual testing is performed by humans.

• Automated testing is faster and more efficient than manual testing.

• Automated testing can be used to perform repetitive tasks and regression testing.

• Manual testing allows for exploratory testing and human judgment.

• Automated testing requires initial setup and maintenance of test scripts.

• Both types of testing have their own advantages and disadvantages.

Resource planning in manual testing

• Identify the scope of testing

• Determine the number of resources required

• Allocate resources based on their skills and experience

• Create a schedule and timeline for testing

• Monitor progress and adjust resources as needed

Test development in manual testing involves creating test cases and executing them manually.

• Identify test scenarios and create test cases

• Execute test cases manually and record results

• Report defects and retest after fixes

• Continuously improve test cases based on feedback and results

• Collaborate with team members to ensure comprehensive testing

Manual testing is done manually by humans while automation testing is done using tools and scripts.

• Manual testing is time-consuming and prone to human errors while automation testing is faster and more reliable.

• Manual testing is suitable for exploratory testing while automation testing is best for regression testing.

• Manual testing requires human skills and knowledge while automation testing requires programming skills.

• Manual testing is cost-effective for small projects while ...read more

Manual testing is the process of testing software manually without using any automated tools.

• Manual testing involves executing test cases manually to identify defects and issues in the software.

• It is a time-consuming process but helps in identifying user experience issues that automated testing may miss.

• Functional testing is a type of manual testing that focuses on testing the functionality of the software.

• It involves testing each function of the software to ensure that it me...read more

Testing is the process of evaluating a system or its component(s) with the intent to find whether it satisfies the specified requirements or not.

• Testing involves executing a system or application with the intent of finding defects or errors.

• It is done to ensure that the system meets the specified requirements and works as expected.

• Testing can be done manually or through automation.

• Automation is the use of software tools to execute tests, compare actual results with expected r...read more

Manual testing involves testing software manually without the use of automation tools, while Selenium is a popular automation testing tool for web applications.

• Manual testing involves executing test cases manually to identify bugs and defects in the software.

• Selenium is an open-source automation testing tool used for automating web applications.

• Manual testing requires human intervention to perform tests, while Selenium scripts can be automated to run tests repeatedly.

• Manual t...read more

Testing is the process of evaluating a system or component to determine if it meets specified requirements.

• Testing is done to identify defects or errors in software.

• Manual testing is performed by human testers, while automation testing is done using tools and scripts.

• Manual testing requires human intervention and is time-consuming, while automation testing is faster and more efficient.

• Manual testing is suitable for small-scale projects or scenarios that require human judgment...read more

Manual testing is the process of manually testing software for defects, while functional testing focuses on testing the functionality of the software.

• Manual testing involves testers executing test cases manually without the use of automation tools.

• Functional testing is a type of testing where the system is tested against the functional requirements/specifications.

• Manual testing is time-consuming but allows for exploratory testing and human intuition.

• Functional testing ensures...read more

Manual testing allows for human intuition and exploratory testing while automation testing saves time and increases efficiency.

• Manual testing allows for more thorough testing of user experience and edge cases

• Automation testing saves time and increases efficiency for repetitive tasks

• Manual testing is better suited for exploratory testing and ad-hoc testing

• Automation testing is better suited for regression testing and load testing

• A combination of both manual and automation test...read more

Manual testing is done by humans, while automation testing is done by using tools and scripts.

• Manual testing is time-consuming and prone to human errors.

• Automation testing is faster and more reliable.

• Manual testing is suitable for exploratory testing and usability testing.

• Automation testing is suitable for regression testing and load testing.

• Manual testing requires human skills and experience.

• Automation testing requires programming skills and knowledge of testing tools.

• Manual...read more

I rate myself highly in both manual and automation testing

• I have extensive experience in manual testing and have developed a keen eye for identifying defects

• I am proficient in automation testing tools such as Selenium and have created automated test scripts for various projects

• I understand the importance of both manual and automation testing and know when to use each approach

• I continuously strive to improve my skills in both areas through training and self-learning

Yes, manual testing report and automation testing report can vary.

• Manual testing report is based on the tester's observations and findings during manual testing.

• Automation testing report is generated by automated testing tools and includes test results and logs.

• Manual testing report may include subjective feedback and observations that cannot be captured by automation.

• Automation testing report provides detailed information on test execution, pass/fail status, and performance ...read more

Both Automation & Manual Testing are important for Quality Test Engineer.

• Manual testing is important for exploratory testing and finding edge cases.

• Automation testing is important for regression testing and saving time.

• The importance of each subject depends on the project requirements and resources available.

• A balance between both manual and automation testing is necessary for effective quality assurance.

Manual testing is done by humans, while automation testing is done by software tools.

• Manual testing involves executing test cases manually without any automation tools.

• Automation testing involves using software tools to execute test cases.

• Manual testing is time-consuming and prone to human errors.

• Automation testing is faster, more reliable, and can be repeated multiple times.

• Manual testing is suitable for exploratory testing, while automation testing is suitable for regressio...read more

Manual testing is done by humans while automation testing is done by machines.

• Manual testing involves human intervention and observation while automation testing involves the use of tools and scripts.

• Manual testing is time-consuming and prone to human errors while automation testing is faster and more accurate.

• Manual testing is suitable for exploratory testing while automation testing is suitable for regression testing.

• Manual testing requires less technical knowledge while au...read more

Manual testing is testing software manually by testers, while automation testing is using tools to automate testing processes.

• Manual testing involves testers manually executing test cases without the use of automation tools

• Automation testing involves using tools to automate the execution of test cases

• Automation testing is faster, more reliable, and can be repeated multiple times without human intervention

• Automation testing is useful for regression testing, load testing, and r...read more

Manual testing is done by humans without the use of automation tools, while automation testing involves using tools to execute test cases.

• Manual testing is time-consuming and prone to human error.

• Automation testing is faster and more reliable.

• Manual testing is suitable for exploratory testing, ad-hoc testing, and usability testing.

• Automation testing is ideal for regression testing, performance testing, and load testing.

• Manual testing requires human intervention for each test ...read more

Manual testing is testing software manually without the use of automation tools, while automation testing is testing software using automation tools.

• Manual testing involves testers manually executing test cases without the use of automation tools.

• Automation testing involves using automation tools to execute test cases.

• Manual testing is time-consuming and prone to human error.

• Automation testing is faster, more reliable, and can be used for repetitive tasks.

• Examples of manual t...read more

Yes, I am proficient in both manual and automation testing.

• I have experience in creating test cases and executing them manually.

• I am skilled in using automation tools like Selenium for testing.

• I understand the benefits of both manual and automation testing and know when to use each method.

• I have successfully implemented automation scripts for regression testing.

• I am familiar with CI/CD pipelines for automated testing.

Manual testing is important for exploratory testing, usability testing, and ad-hoc testing.

• Manual testing allows for exploratory testing where testers can explore the application and identify unexpected issues.

• Usability testing, which involves real users interacting with the software, is best done manually to capture user experience.

• Ad-hoc testing, where testers randomly test the application without predefined test cases, is more effective when done manually.

• Manual testing is...read more

Automation testing cannot completely replace manual testing due to certain limitations and the need for human intuition.

• Automation testing is great for repetitive tasks and regression testing.

• Manual testing is essential for exploratory testing, usability testing, and edge case scenarios.

• Certain aspects of testing like user experience and human intuition cannot be automated.

• Combining both manual and automation testing is the most effective approach for comprehensive test cover...read more

Manual testing involves human testers executing test cases without automation tools, while automation testing uses tools to execute test cases.

• Manual testing requires human intervention to execute test cases and verify results

• Automation testing involves using tools to automate test case execution and result verification

• Manual testing is time-consuming and prone to human error

• Automation testing is faster, more reliable, and can be used for repetitive tasks

• Manual testing is sui...read more

Manual testing is done manually by testers, while automation testing uses tools to execute test cases.

• Manual testing involves human intervention to test software functionality.

• Automation testing uses tools to execute test cases, reducing human effort.

• Manual testing is time-consuming and prone to errors, while automation testing is faster and more reliable.

• Manual testing is suitable for exploratory testing, while automation testing is ideal for regression testing.

• Examples: Man...read more

It depends on the project requirements and resources available.

• Manual testing is suitable for small projects or projects with frequent changes.

• Automation testing is suitable for large projects or projects with repetitive tasks.

• A combination of both manual and automation testing can be used for optimal results.

• Factors such as budget, timeline, and skillset of the team should also be considered.

• Ultimately, the decision should be based on what will provide the most efficient and...read more

HTTP methods differ in manual and automation testing in terms of execution speed, accuracy, and coverage.

• Manual testing involves human intervention and is time-consuming.

• Automation testing is faster and more accurate.

• Automation testing can cover a larger number of test cases.

• Manual testing is better for exploratory testing and usability testing.

• Automation testing is better for regression testing and load testing.

• Both manual and automation testing are important for comprehensi...read more

Manual testing is done by humans to ensure software functionality, while automation testing uses tools to execute test cases.

• Manual testing involves testers executing test cases manually without the use of automation tools

• Automation testing involves using tools to execute test cases, often faster and more efficiently than manual testing

• Manual testing is better suited for exploratory testing and ad-hoc testing, while automation testing is ideal for repetitive tasks and regress...read more

Automation testing is faster, more reliable, and scalable compared to manual testing.

• Automation testing is faster as it can execute tests much quicker than manual testing.

• Automation testing is more reliable as it eliminates human errors and ensures consistent test results.

• Automation testing is scalable as it can run tests on multiple configurations and environments simultaneously.

• Manual testing is better suited for exploratory testing and usability testing where human judgmen...read more