AmbitionBox
Discover Best Places to work in India
Discover best places to work
Compare & find best workplace
Bring your workplace to life
Highlight your company's perks
Read reviews for 6L+ companies
Rate your former or current company
Discover salaries for 8L+ companies
Calculate your take home salary
Check your market value
Help other jobseekers
Read interviews for 90K+ companies
Interviews questions for 1K+ colleges
Contribute your interview questions
Logical Reasoning
Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.
Statement : Should the sex determination test during pregnancy be completely banned ?Arguments :I. Yes, this leads to indiscriminate female foeticide and eventually will lead to social imbalance.II. No, people have a right to know about their unborn child.
Only argument I is strong.
Only Argument II is strong.
Either I or II is strong
Neither I nor II is strong
Parents indulging in sex determination of their unborn child generally do so as they want to keep only a boy child and do away with girl child. So, argument I hold strong. Also, people have right to know only about the health, development and general well-being of the child before its birth, and not the sex. So, argument II does not hold strong.
Statement : Should Government close down loss making public sector enterprise ?Arguments :I. No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do.II. Yes, in a competitive world the rule is survival is of the fittest.
Only argument II is strong
Closing, down public-sector enterprise ill definitely throw the engaged person out of employment. So, argument I hold strong. also, closing down is no solution for a loss- making enterprise. Rather , its causes of failure should be studied, canalized and the essential reforms implemented. Even if this does not work out, the enterprise may be privatized. So, argument II is vague.
Statement : Should all the criminal convicted for committing murder be awarded capital punishment ?
Arguments :I. Yes, this will be a significant step towards reducing cases of murder in future.II. No, nobody has the right to take any person's life irrespective the acts of such individuals.
Argument I is strong because by giving capital punishment to murderers, the cases of murdering will be reduced. Argument II is weak because by doing so there will be increase in such criminal cases day-by-day.
Statement : Should there be a maximum ceiling imposed on the earnings of an individual in an organization ?Arguments :I. Yes, this is the only way to create more opportunities for those who seek professional training.II. No, this will dilute the quality of professional training as all such colleges may not be equipped to conduct such course.
Both I are II and strong
Both the arguments are strong because by doing so, students will get more opportunities and it is also correct that without any affiliation the quality of training will decrease.
Statement : Should the Government restrict all political and religious processions without prior permission of the government ?
Arguments :I. Yes, such processions lead to riots many times.II. No, this is against the human rights in a democratic country.
Both I and II are strong.
Either I or II is strong. Generally the undesirable elements in processions do so wrong things with the purpose to disturb the peace. Hence restrictions for such processions is necessary. But in democratic country this is against the human race.
Join India’s largest community to research company culture
Are you a student or working professional?
Student/Never worked
I am a student/I have never worked
Working Professional
I am working/I have worked before
What are your preferred job locations?
Popular Cities
Other Cities
Follow your preferred designations/job profiles
Suggestions based on your job profile
vs
Similar Companies