TestingXperts Test Engineer Reviews

Likes

Likes are to get poor work life balance. This company is client-centric company and you may have to compromise with you family members in order to fulfill the company's expectations. If you're thinking of joining this company, please review atleast 10-15 reviews and must see who is happy in this company.

Dislikes

Worst company in India. No other company has lower standard than this one. Believe me or you can have your own personal experience but I am sure you will not continue in this company for more than 12-15 months. Please read your contract carefully. I read one comment in the reviews here and observed this company has a same clause forwhich Infosys was reprimanded in Supreme court. That is, you are not allowed to work for their competitor for a period of 12 months. Read it carefully. This is against you and every IT employee and based on this you will be blackmailed and harrassed for paying out money to them. Otherwise your documents will be denied in case you submit resignation and join other company. Be very careful. This is the reason their 70-80% workforce leave every year. Only top management till associate directors are surviving in this company, rest other Associate engineers, engineers and senior engineers are replaced every year. Either top leadership or legal counsellors will be happy in this company. Now you decide why legal counsellors are happy in an IT company? Join this company only if you're dying of hunger, your sufferings may be delayed but definitely the HR of this company will make you suffer more. If you think that this review is a biased one, then connect with atleast any one ex-employee of this company. Ask her/him for their experience in this company. Forget about your salary increments, they may target to extort money by sending you legal notices at the time of your resignation because then you'd become one of the company's enemy. They have good team of lawyers for extorting money....Read More

Work Details

Work days: Monday to Friday (Strict Timings)

Work related travel: This is a desk job.

Likes

Work life balance

Dislikes

No dislike

Work Details

Work days: Monday to Friday (Flexible Timings)

Work related travel: This is a desk job.

Likes

The best environment and work life balance

Dislikes

Nothing

Work Details

Work policy: 2 days/week from office

Work days: Monday to Friday (Flexible Timings)

Likes

Great working environment with supportive colleagues and management.

Dislikes

There is nothing as of now.

Work Details

Work days: Monday to Friday (Flexible Timings)

Work related travel: This is a desk job.

Likes

Work environment

Dislikes

Skill upgrade and not providing opportunities for career growth

Work Details

Work policy: 2 days/week from office

Work days: Monday to Friday (Flexible Timings)

Work related travel: This is a desk job.

Likes

I haven't had any positives while working here.

Dislikes

I regret to share that my experience at this company has been quite disheartening. The work environment, unfortunately, falls on the side of toxicity. It is apparent that the cultural issues extend beyond just the higher management and pervade into the employee interactions as well. One notable concern revolves around certain individuals, particularly an Associate Director who I can’t name here, who appears to wield a disproportionate influence. Engaging in any form of disagreement with him can unfortunately lead to a distressing experience, as it seemingly wounds his ego and triggers a hostile response. His professional conduct lacks the necessary etiquettes and often involves belittling and mocking individuals, sometimes even within group forums. Regrettably, my own performance appraisal suffered due to this dynamic. Astonishingly, my Team Lead sided with him, citing my disagreement as a form of disrespect towards him, subsequently impacting my appraisal negatively. This underscores a concerning trend where dissent is misconstrued as disrespect, leading to unfavourable outcomes. The ongoing tolerance of such behaviour raises questions about the management's stance. It seems that a group has formed around him that operates with a certain level of favouritism, which can indeed be demoralising for others. This situation has persisted over an extended period, suggesting a tacit approval from higher-ups, which is concerning. The company's client-centric approach is commendable, but it sometimes appears to come at the expense of employee well-being. It's evident that there's an imbalance in the treatment of employees versus clients, with the latter receiving more significant attention and accommodation. The policies in place further compound these issues. Some policies seem skewed in favour of the company and can lead to situations that feel unjust. For instance, the ability to suspend an employee without pay based solely on "Client Feedback" is a practice that warrants careful reconsideration. Additionally, the absence of safeguards against employee mistreatment is a concern that deserves attention. Several policy aspects raise eyebrows. The lack of clear guidelines for working hours when stationed at client locations and the absence of provisions for overtime compensation leave employees in a precarious position. A prolonged notice period of three months and restrictions on taking casual leaves during the notice period further add to the discomfort. Regrettably, the culture of employee engagement is notably absent within the company. The efforts to solicit and act upon feedback, provide transparency regarding policies, and establish effective communication channels appear inadequate. The company's stance on work arrangements, such as work from home and office expectations, lacks clarity and consistency. The ambiguity surrounding the criteria for determining remote work eligibility creates confusion among employees. Equally troubling is the practice of relying on client feedback without substantial evidence, potentially subjecting employees to undue hardship. This can foster an environment where managers prioritise retaliation over constructive resolution. Even when presented with concrete evidence, the company's tendency to suppress and disregard the matter, rather than address it transparently, is profoundly disheartening. In conclusion, it's evident that the company has some shortcomings in fostering a healthy work environment and ensuring employee well-being. While the professional challenges one might encounter in any role can be expected, the current state described above goes beyond the norm. For those who prioritise their mental peace and a balanced work-life situation, it's advisable to approach this company with caution. While attractive salary offers might be enticing, the toll on well-being might outweigh the benefits....Read More

Work Details

Very bad worst experience

Work days: Monday to Friday (Strict Timings)

Work related travel: This job involves Travel Within City, Travel Within Country.

Likes

Good work culture

Dislikes

Should do good appraisals and promotion

Work Details

Work days: Monday to Friday (Flexible Timings)

Work related travel: This is a desk job.

Likes

Learning

Dislikes

Timing and sometimes it get too long

Work Details

Work policy: 2 days/week from office

Work days: Monday to Saturday (Strict Timings)

Work related travel: This is a desk job.