Ethos Life Test Engineer salaries in India

Likes

Salary, allowance.. That's the best here

Dislikes

Complete work from office that too during night shift is something which has destroyed the work life balance. Job security is also something which is a matter of concern.

Likes

Salary is only good part

Dislikes

There are so many 1. Too much ambiguity in process 2. Managers answer your doubts uninterestedly. 3. There are “Karens” in process who think they own the process and always there to point out mistakes or want to find mistakes for escalating the issues to prove incompetence. 4. Leadership is always learning unit economics but never in ground reality. 5. Very less funds left as they burnt a lot for business and fancy paycheck. 6. Layoffs rounds are common forgot the count. 7. India team is a puppet of overseas Leadership. 8. Investors are asking questions about profitability. They can’t raise another round as market is volatile. 9. 95% of startups fail but these people are inviting it very soon. 10. They have 4-5 carriers for business with some agents who are clueless almost all the time. All those carriers also aren’t in good terms. 11. The carrier being such litigious organisations never thought of outsourcing in India but these people did without informing them. 12. These people buy reviews from Google, Trustpilot and new entry is Glassdoor . Employees get paid for these reviews. 13. Please join the company only if you don’t have any option in life apart from Death.

Likes

Nothing, full of egoistic people and lack of knowledge I wanted to share my recent interview experience for a Senior Data Analyst position with Ethos Life. The process started with a HackerRank test, which I passed, followed by an interview. During the interview, the panel, led by Mr. Ram Kishore Pasupathi, asked about my background and then gave me a question with a 15-minute time limit. The criteria for evaluation were: - Speed - Accuracy - Readability - Scalability I solved the problem in 3-5 minutes and explained my approach step-by-step using a Google Sheet. The interviewer told me my solution was incorrect. I rechecked my work and insisted it was correct, offering to demonstrate it using PostgreSQL if given two minutes. He declined, stating he could read SQL. I mentioned that there were multiple ways to solve the problem and offered to explain a few more approaches, but he didn't respond. Despite my confidence in my answer, the interview, which was scheduled for an hour, ended after just 15 minutes with only that one question. After the interview, I created the table and applied my solution, which worked perfectly. I shared this with the hiring team, but I was ultimately not selected. While not being selected is part of the process, interview panels should adhere to basic ethics. Candidates invest a significant amount of time preparing for tests and interviews. Experiences like this can severely impact a candidate's morale. Note: My intention is not to damage the reputation of any individual or organization but to highlight how such incidents can affect candidates' morale. I felt that the interviewer, Mr. Ram Kishore Pasupathi, might have taken my quick solution as a challenge to his ego. Although he gave me 15 minutes, I solved the problem in less than 3-5 minutes. It seemed he took my quick resolution personally. I would advise the company and the interview panel to teach basic ethics to their employees on how to conduct interviews. If a candidate demonstrates knowledge that an employee may not have, it should be seen as an opportunity for learning and growth, rather than a blow to ego. I also request that the company review with your team, as I have a Google Sheet with timestamps. Furthermore, please consider recording interviews and sharing these recordings with the candidate also for review.

Dislikes

I wanted to share my recent interview experience for a Senior Data Analyst position with Ethos Life. The process started with a HackerRank test, which I passed, followed by an interview. During the interview, the panel, led by Mr. Ram Kishore Pasupathi, asked about my background and then gave me a question with a 15-minute time limit. The criteria for evaluation were: - Speed - Accuracy - Readability - Scalability I solved the problem in 3-5 minutes and explained my approach step-by-step using a Google Sheet. The interviewer told me my solution was incorrect. I rechecked my work and insisted it was correct, offering to demonstrate it using PostgreSQL if given two minutes. He declined, stating he could read SQL. I mentioned that there were multiple ways to solve the problem and offered to explain a few more approaches, but he didn't respond. Despite my confidence in my answer, the interview, which was scheduled for an hour, ended after just 15 minutes with only that one question. After the interview, I created the table and applied my solution, which worked perfectly. I shared this with the hiring team, but I was ultimately not selected. While not being selected is part of the process, interview panels should adhere to basic ethics. Candidates invest a significant amount of time preparing for tests and interviews. Experiences like this can severely impact a candidate's morale. Note: My intention is not to damage the reputation of any individual or organization but to highlight how such incidents can affect candidates' morale. I felt that the interviewer, Mr. Ram Kishore Pasupathi, might have taken my quick solution as a challenge to his ego. Although he gave me 15 minutes, I solved the problem in less than 3-5 minutes. It seemed he took my quick resolution personally. I would advise the company and the interview panel to teach basic ethics to their employees on how to conduct interviews. If a candidate demonstrates knowledge that an employee may not have, it should be seen as an opportunity for learning and growth, rather than a blow to ego. I also request that the company review with your team, as I have a Google Sheet with timestamps. Furthermore, please consider recording interviews and sharing these recordings with the candidate also for review.