Amazon Software Development Engineer 1 salaries in India

Likes

1. Pay and perks are good 2. Tech stack is great and amazon shifts to new tech stack if needed so we can keep ourselves updated with latest tech

Dislikes

1. WLB is bad 2. Management is pure look, either you will get a very good or very bad, no middle ground. Depends on org

Likes

Good salary, challenging work, smart coworkers

Dislikes

Toxic work environment, pip culture, people becoming toxic due to the culture, work load, too much emphasis on useless leadership principles being used to justify toxicity

Likes

The salary structure is good.

Dislikes

You wont get any appreciation even if you work day and night. They expect 200% out of you and even if you give your 200%, you won't get any appreciation because that is what is expected. If you are performing good, that is average according to them and you will always be told to raise the bar. Job security is very less. But it always depends on the team.

Likes

The office is great and you have best in industry compensation.

Dislikes

Worst work life balance. The managers have to ask you to work at least 10 hrs a day and the work 12. Your performance is measured against the team so if everyone is working 12 hours and you can work 8 you will always be the bottom performer. Promotions are project based so if your.projects gets halted for any reason not you own so does your promotion.

Likes

None

Dislikes

With the exception of salary-related disparities that also exist within the hierarchical levels, the working environment at Amazon India is distressing. It lacks adequate work-life balance, necessitating the review of emails even late at night due to the centralized control from Seattle, which operates during typical sleep hours. The implementation of a somewhat arbitrary 14-point policy is noticeable, selectively enforced based on convenience. The quality of group meetings is subpar. The promotion of negative behavior among colleagues is encouraged, given that performance evaluations hinge not on assessments from superiors, but rather on appraisals from fellow employees, who concurrently serve as competitors.