MagicBricks MIS Lead salaries in India

Likes

Nothing much to say about likes except for salary structure to save taxes(not the salary paid) and you get to work with new technologies here.

Dislikes

No work life balance, not promoted much, not so high salary, micro management, policies which doesn't benefit employee much, toxic hierarchy, no work from home.

Likes

Good Learning curve for 1-2 years only

Dislikes

Worst management Uneven Salary Politics by seniors and they took credit for others work. Sales oriented company not technology oriented. Managers of technology are not from technical background.

Likes

As a freshers, we have to work a lot, so get to learn many technologies. People are approachable.

Dislikes

...on in the company even knows the mistake made by smallest person in the company. Leave is never approved, People are going to festivals by taking Loss Without Pay. If performance is not gud then freshers of even 5 monthexperience are also terminated. so, job security is also zero. Casual leave also, they don't approve. When they are not willing to approve leave, why is leave policy even exist? Is that for nameshake?

Likes

It is better place to start your carrier and getting better package as a fresher.

Dislikes

There is no learning in this company and the support behaviour is not good. They doesn't coperate with you. As an MIS Analyst I'm saying that your work is totally or mostly based on formula and functions. But they assign you manual tasks which you can't automate. And exploits you by assigning you the works which is not related to your field though.

Likes

Great infrastructure.

Dislikes

...ers are underpaid (only 8-10k) while being made to handle significant workloads. The compensation offered to freshers is shockingly low, making it an unattractive place for young professionals seeking fair pay and career growth. 3. Favoritism & Referral Bias: There is a clear bias towards existing employees. Since the company provides monetary incentives for employee referrals, current employees primarily refer their close ones rather than qualified candidates. This has resulted in a toxic work culture where deserving candidates are overlooked in favor of personal connections. 4. Questionable Leadership in the Legal Department: The Head Legal is on a contract but does not contribute effectively. Attendance is irregular, and even when present, personal work seems to take priority over company responsibilities . Additionally, the hiring of the Assistant Legal Manager raises serious concerns about favoritism and ethical standards. 5. Nepotism & Unethical Practices: The appointment of the Assistant Manager Legal appears to be a case of blatant nepotism. It might be possible that the Head Legal received financial benefits in exchange for recommending the candidate. This raises serious ethical concerns and questions the integrity of the hiring process. Such careless hiring has negatively impacted the efficiency and credibility of the legal department. FINAL VERDICT: This company prioritizes favoritism, internal politics, and personal gains over talent and merit. Freshers should be cautious before joining, as they are likely to be exploited with low pay and contractual roles. The legal department, in particular, suffers from poor leadership, unethical hiring, and inefficiency. A serious overhaul of the hiring process and leadership accountability is necessary for the company to improve its work culture. WOULD NOT RECOMMEND TO FRESHERS OR PROFESSIONALS LOOKING FOR FAIR CAREER OPPROTUNITIES.