Shapoorji Pallonji Group Senior MEP Engineer salaries in Chandrapur (Updated 2025)

Likes

I am very glad that I am be the part of a big group.. Our company is working 17 countries all over the world.. Since last 30 years... I learned soft skill and technical skill development. Working environment and culture is good and management is supportive to staff .. I get full accommodation as per company norms.

Dislikes

The growth is slow and no compensation as per performance.. Work pressure is too much.. I have to work 12 to 14 hrs per days..but results same.. no any appreciation and not carrier growth..

Likes

Job security alone rest no salary increments.

Dislikes

Its a contracting firm ECC where you work like a labor job and people are at your back always to probe and exploit you. Favoritism is the structure of the organization. The VP projects Mr.Sandesh Vaivude he himself is the culprit not helping with the down orders rather giving freedom to whom he likes. It is better to join petty contractors than to join such company. Increment is to the favorites only and rest 4 percent increment all the times.

Likes

Work satisfaction job security and skills development. Independently handle the various projects

Dislikes

Due to management issues many good staff should ignore in increment and promotions new comers less experience has more salary structure as compared to old staff

Likes

Nothing

Dislikes

This is very unethical organisation. It do not give my full and final salary payment even after 2 year. I file a legal case against shapoorji Pallonji through labour court. Totally a bad company. I think court need to put it's all owner in jail because he didn't gave employee salary even after switch off the job. If anyone have some strong step that we take against shapoorji Pallonji to put him in prison please suggest me.

Likes

Apart From work life balance, nothing much to like

Dislikes

1. Salary timing is not fixed. once in 2 month approx 2. Top level involvement in small small activities. 3. Poor decision making 4. No decision making authority given to P.M site